The truth is that there is a forced winrate, and only if you are very skilled you can balance the amount of retarded players in the "bad games", while the "good games" are extremely easy to win even if you are not skilled.
How can someone ruin a game if they are an account buyer if 7k's are so good, they should be able to play around any team failure, according your logic
OP you fucking half brain, everyone's logic is not that 4 6ks and a 2k against 5 6ks is an easy win.. Its that 4 2ks and an 8k(as you would like to call yourself) can easily win against 5 2ks.. Because an 8k player playing a core will just outplay all the 2ks, which you aren't able to do.. Hence you are 2k
he is only judging from his own perspective, of what he experiences in his side of his monitor.
OP please give an educated opinion basing on the whole story, not on just a cover picture.
maybe ppl will stop linking you to medical websites.
if u wanna git gud and get higha in mmr i suck ur kuk and giff me moni so i can feed my famiry EKSDEE
I don't really understand why people complain so much about their teammates. I was calibrated at 3.1k when I first started ranked MM and now I am at 4.3k. I mainly play support and didn't complain much about what my other teammate did. I never considered myself to be more skilled or know the game better than my teammates. I agree that there are some "toxic" players but generally, everyone is trying their best to win games.
I honestly think that MMR differentiates the skills and knowledge of players of the game. I felt like I have learnt a lot from playing Ranked this and I believe the rise in my MMR is due to better reaction time, efficiency, game understanding, decision making, etc. I honestly don't think the MMR system is rigged intentionally. The reason that I am 4k and not 6k+ is simply because I am not as skilled or as efficient as 6k players. Maybe players in the high MMR bracket or low MMR bracket may act differently but in my current MMR bracket, everything seems acceptable. Maybe OP should tell us his MMR so that we can better understand the situation.
M8, there is such a thing as boosters, those are skilled players (5ks, 6ks, maybe 7ks), that breeze thro the 2k, 3k, 4k brackets with ease. And have an outstanding winrate no matter how many throwers they encounter in their teams. But those are exceptional cases, people with skill just slightly above their current bracket will not be able to compensate the throwers, and will unwillingly be forced to win or loose by this match making algorithm.
So yes, if you are much much MUCH better than your bracket you can grow, if you are just better it wont be enough to rise mmr.
P.S. @jacked, just because you are blind and/or delusional doesn't mean it doesn't exist :)))
From your guys's logic, its absolutely impossible for a 7k player to lose against anyone lower than 6k mmr. From your logic, if a 7k player came to my game and pick carry I could intentionally throw his game and he would still win. I actually have alot of teammates that play worse than someone who just feeds non stop intentionally.
ofc its not imposible for a 7k to loose to a 4k, its just a lot a lot less likely that for a 4500mmr to a 4000 mmr. So If you deserve to be 4500 you can get stuck in the 4000mmr because of forced winrate, if you deserve to be 6kmmr, it will be much easier for you to grow from 4k to 6k. Understand the idea now ?
If you are much-much better its easier to rise mmr, if you are just better its extremely hard.
That's not me ROFL. That account isn't mine, i boosted it a bit for fun.
EDIT:
ROFL It's hanter, since you're an imbecile to begin with. If you had a brain, you would see the region and understand that I am from EU not indonesia / SEA.
Interisting view of OP but lots of his posts are untrue and same with others guys who doesn't agree with him.
1v1 doesn't measure your probability to win games. I remember playing a games in party and was the lowest mmr from party 3.3k I took pudge mid and their highest mmr guys picked storm mid 4.6k. Killed storm twice before his lvl 6 without any support involved or him diving me, so I got blink early and killed him after his lvl 6. Baically I just killed him three times in pure 1v1 situation. So why this guy had higher mmr than me ? Probably because he's more a team player than me.
I would like to talk to with OP about poker as I play a lot poker myself and I'm aware of the fulltilt super-users, but what he said about his tourneys are untrue and I would gadly prove him if we can discuss it on other place.
" but what he said about his tourneys are untrue and I would gadly prove him if we can discuss it on other place." Well, it simply is true because I experienced it first hand. I would literally have tournaments where I win every pot. After sucking out twice in the tournament, ridiculously like getting quads on the river and one card flush set over set I would just know that I am going to win the whole thing. I could do whatever I want in these tournament and nobody win a single pot from me. I tested the theory of winning/losing based on buyins and how much ive lost. I know that I was marked somehow as a fish.
I also played quit a few 100$ headsup liveplay games and I would like never win a pot. Every time I make a raise I just get called and would lose to some random bullshit, every single fucking time. I make big raises in headsup and they just call call call call call and win somehow.I dont just raise every single hand either. I play my pairs conservatively when they betting. I don't draw for low returns. I do everything basically standard. I watched alot of DURR and other famous players style and nothing special was happening. They win/lose big pots and get tangled just like anyone else.
I understand there is such thing as variance in poker, but when every time you play you see crazy ass shit like 4 people to a flop and they all make a hand and shit like this happens constantly you start to question. When people are constantly playling like shti against you but winning it makes you question. Like, say you have 100 bb, someone raise you with nothing preflop so you call a 3x blind raise with a PP like 88, flop come something like A 8 2. You bet out, they raise you go all in they call you with a hand like 10 8. Make a running flush and take your money you start to question.
I have played real poker as well, and these things happen but its not like it happens in online poker, this starts to happen online when you start winning some of your money back. It always happens in streaks that are highly noticable. I almost won 10k in a 300 man 250$ buyin tournament in real live poker. I was deep in tourny with a huge stack 15 people left, I had like 30% of all the chips. I was dealt KK and made a pot sized raise after a few people limped. I got reraised by a guy with 1010 and then I came over the top of him all in and hel called (was a stupid old man didnt know wtf he was doing) I could tell I had the best hand before he turned them over. Anways doorcar 10 second card was a brick and then 3rd card was a K. So he sucked out on me, then I recooperated. Next thing I know he made running diamonds. This was actually the second pot I lose in the whole tournament because I always had the best hand. The point of this story is that I know when suckouts are legitimate and that they happen. Same tournament, I had someone read my hand exactly when I flopped quads. I checked because I knew there was no way he made anything and if I bet he will just fold. We checked to the river and he was like "did you have quads". I was blown away. I mean, it was obvious that he didn't hit so I couldn't bet but I would have done the same shit with alot of other hands. Online poker, this shit doesn't happen. Online poker you only have the best hand when the game wants you to.
I actually got in that tourny off of a satellite to for 30$. So I still made money, but it was a long drive and took a long time to play the tournament. I know that I was better than 95% of the players there and that I could make money if there was no expense for gas to get there and whatnot. Unfortunately nobody wins lowerstake games but the casino itlr.
Quit posting 1k MMR games, that really means nothing. I am talking about 4k+ games here. Ofc you can beat 1k mmr players they are mentally retarded or new to dota. There is no fucking money in 1k mmr games they don't need to put any systems in place for these players cause they are already bad.
so your argument against boosters is that valve can detect boosters.
what. the. fuck.
by acknowledging boosters, u are acknowledging that there are people who are that much better in dota. skill differences exist, hence boosters can exist and boost mmr of low mmr accounts. a lot of proof was shown that boosters have a very easy time in the mmr range that you are struggling with. this is evidence that skill matters and not "valve rigging".
then you say that valve can detect boosters somehow. okay. then what does valve do? let them boost by giving them easier games? that doesnt make sense at all. what the fuck. shouldnt valve be putting 8k players against these boosters then since valve is so all-powerful and controlling?
just like how valve is keeping u down? if anything, it is proof that skill trumps any kind of match fixing. as long as u find a way to destroy the throne, u will keep winning. you can't find a way to destroy the throne. hence you suck.
I don't really understand why people complain so much about their teammates. I was calibrated at 3.1k when I first started ranked MM and now I am at 4.3k.
That's because cancer feeder teammates are, most of the time, between 1MMR and 2500MMR. That low because they are not capable of climbing the ladder due to how hard they suck and/or cancer they are. So yeah, you don't understand because you were good enough to simply jump through the trash tier during calibration. Its a mistake that im not gonna repeat again.
From my perspective - low-middle 4k is bunch of useless tards with no clue about Dota 2. And they're driving me so mad when i see how bad and stupid they are and the shit they make. I tend to focus on them more than my own play and i play worse than i could - still on way higher level than them. If i see at least 1 solid player then i'm fine, if all of them are useless shit gets real. I really need some anger management program or need to stop playing this game for the sake of my own mental and physical health.
^ this is because game is rigged in upper brackets. i think they rig some certain people from even being able to get 4k if they are a much higher skill. i think they put good with bad against medium often, making good seem like medium or bad. either that or its just a dogshit MM system.
"by acknowledging boosters, u are acknowledging that there are people who are that much better in dota. skill differences exist, hence boosters can exist and boost mmr of low mmr accounts. a lot of proof was shown that boosters have a very easy time in the mmr range that you are struggling with. this is evidence that skill matters and not "valve rigging"."
i never ever once said that skill differences dont exist. i said that i think the game is rigged against alot of people who have actual skill. what im saying is that i think there are more people who are good at the game compared to pro's and high tier players than you could identify by mmr. If you look at upper bracket games there is alot of medium level play. there is also, only a few games 6k+ going at any given time. Where 4k games there is probably thousands. and 5k games probly like 15-20. i feel like they keep the tippy top very pointy where it should be more of a rounded shape
So basically, my theory is, they chose said player... Use inflated mmr as opponents and give them favorable odds to win more games. MMR is very arbitrary actually. Sometimes you will see a 4k game that looks like a 6k game, sometimes you will see a 6k game that looks like a 2k game.
I can watch 7k games and predict quit often exactly what needs to happen. If you watch my video i made(shit qual video sorry if you can bare with it i commend u) but in the video i do make some predictions that run true. I can watch alot of high mmr game and see the mistakes. sometimes i talking from my ass not gonna lie but alot of the time i can see clear cut obvious things that most people dont pay attention to.
Not only 4k's are bad. Just look at this 7k naix, 6k invoker and 5.5k lion in my team. while i won hard vs bot trilane, they just fed and were useless whole game. This shit is happening literally every game, must be in some hidden pool or some shit.
People have this delusion that if you are 7k mmr you can just win any situation unless its against another 7kmmr. If you get zoned out of your lane it doesn't matter how good enemy is. There is alot of situation where you walk up to creeps and try to get a last hit and your damage exchange is too high to farm. There is no magic 7k mmr item that will make you magically be able to farm against an agressive lane with no support. I just made a smurf earlier. I win my first game, second game I just DC beacuse I am in safelane with no support against an ursa and a lich. The lich was constantly auto attacking me as PL. I had an enigma in the jungle farming creeps and literally I coulda killed both of them if he just left jungle and press Q on them. He waitied until 7 minutes into game and I only have 13 LH cause of it. Then what he did was walk up to them and micro so poorly that he didnt even get a spell off and fed the ursa a kill. What is my option this situation? I cant magically farm creeps if someone is constantly attacking me, nomadder how bad they are. My laning opponents were nothing special, but its not like they were so bad that I could just get freefarm in a 1v2 lane. Sitting for exp doesnt cut it as far as getting a extremely high score... which is what is needed to not get a even worse team next game. I mean, I probably coulda won the game but ive played games like this before on new account and even winning not enough u need massive last hits and farm to not play 10 normal games after that.
7K NAIX AND 5.5K LION VS SOLO OFFLANE 4K TECHIES AND THEY LOST IT 1-8 OR SOME SHIT WHILE I WIN VS REALLY HIGH MMR TRILANE WITH SOME HELP OF TUSK. HELLO? 6K VOKER GETS DESTROYED IN HIS LANE VS SOLO URSA. HELLO?
if it isnt obvious enough already, MMR doesn't accurately represent your SKILL but your ABILITY TO CLIMB THE LADDER/MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION ON IT.
stop being so butthurt about your number it's 100% worthless. I don't care whether I'm 3.2, 4.2 or 5.2 and you shouldn't either. there is no real competitive environment in solo RMM until at least 5.5k. if you're not able to climb to 5.5k easily, you have nothing to look for there.
it really is that simple. mmr hell exists - you create it by overvaluing your teammates and undervaluing yourself.
we should encourage him to overdose and die
The truth is that there is a forced winrate, and only if you are very skilled you can balance the amount of retarded players in the "bad games", while the "good games" are extremely easy to win even if you are not skilled.
How can someone ruin a game if they are an account buyer if 7k's are so good, they should be able to play around any team failure, according your logic
4v5 = game ruined
or 4v6
Why does these threads has responses? o.O
it's just waste of time.
OP you fucking half brain, everyone's logic is not that 4 6ks and a 2k against 5 6ks is an easy win.. Its that 4 2ks and an 8k(as you would like to call yourself) can easily win against 5 2ks.. Because an 8k player playing a core will just outplay all the 2ks, which you aren't able to do.. Hence you are 2k
haro i shitstaayn. rook at my profile its all covered ein shite. pls halpa mee :(
anyway OP is right; HALF-RIGHT.
he is only judging from his own perspective, of what he experiences in his side of his monitor.
OP please give an educated opinion basing on the whole story, not on just a cover picture.
maybe ppl will stop linking you to medical websites.
if u wanna git gud and get higha in mmr i suck ur kuk and giff me moni so i can feed my famiry EKSDEE
be this guy: http://www.dotabuff.com/topics/2016-07-06-pma-positivity-wins-games-lads
dont forgit ur topic title is "Ok, I let my anger get the best of me. Sorry."
I don't really understand why people complain so much about their teammates. I was calibrated at 3.1k when I first started ranked MM and now I am at 4.3k. I mainly play support and didn't complain much about what my other teammate did. I never considered myself to be more skilled or know the game better than my teammates. I agree that there are some "toxic" players but generally, everyone is trying their best to win games.
I honestly think that MMR differentiates the skills and knowledge of players of the game. I felt like I have learnt a lot from playing Ranked this and I believe the rise in my MMR is due to better reaction time, efficiency, game understanding, decision making, etc. I honestly don't think the MMR system is rigged intentionally. The reason that I am 4k and not 6k+ is simply because I am not as skilled or as efficient as 6k players. Maybe players in the high MMR bracket or low MMR bracket may act differently but in my current MMR bracket, everything seems acceptable. Maybe OP should tell us his MMR so that we can better understand the situation.
one of the sad things about delusion is that it is not curable but argument or logic.
hands down the most delusional "mmr is rigged" retard ever to grace dotabuff forum.
M8, there is such a thing as boosters, those are skilled players (5ks, 6ks, maybe 7ks), that breeze thro the 2k, 3k, 4k brackets with ease. And have an outstanding winrate no matter how many throwers they encounter in their teams. But those are exceptional cases, people with skill just slightly above their current bracket will not be able to compensate the throwers, and will unwillingly be forced to win or loose by this match making algorithm.
So yes, if you are much much MUCH better than your bracket you can grow, if you are just better it wont be enough to rise mmr.
P.S. @jacked, just because you are blind and/or delusional doesn't mean it doesn't exist :)))
shameless bump
Not really, just one of the few subjects that are interesting nowadays...
U dont think the game can recognize boosters? #didntread
"Hence you are 2k" Conjurer
From your guys's logic, its absolutely impossible for a 7k player to lose against anyone lower than 6k mmr. From your logic, if a 7k player came to my game and pick carry I could intentionally throw his game and he would still win. I actually have alot of teammates that play worse than someone who just feeds non stop intentionally.
ofc its not imposible for a 7k to loose to a 4k, its just a lot a lot less likely that for a 4500mmr to a 4000 mmr. So If you deserve to be 4500 you can get stuck in the 4000mmr because of forced winrate, if you deserve to be 6kmmr, it will be much easier for you to grow from 4k to 6k. Understand the idea now ?
If you are much-much better its easier to rise mmr, if you are just better its extremely hard.
vhs player
http://www.dotabuff.com/players/354072524
I have anger issues too guys, i admit. Shitstains just piss me off too much, need to work on that.
That's a bot, not a player, its used just to give stats to real players...
That's exacly what we are saying
Me on noob account:
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1733124177
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1946019135
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1929840130
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1923437398
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/1931663376
It doesn't matter how shit they are, it doesn't matter how much they feed. If you are way better than your bracket you can literally 1v9 it.
What about this?
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2488973988
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2488133524
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2488018930
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2487782344
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2486743626
1k mmr bracket too hard? XD
Are you an imbecile?
That's not me ROFL. That account isn't mine, i boosted it a bit for fun.
EDIT:
ROFL It's hanter, since you're an imbecile to begin with. If you had a brain, you would see the region and understand that I am from EU not indonesia / SEA.
Interisting view of OP but lots of his posts are untrue and same with others guys who doesn't agree with him.
1v1 doesn't measure your probability to win games. I remember playing a games in party and was the lowest mmr from party 3.3k I took pudge mid and their highest mmr guys picked storm mid 4.6k. Killed storm twice before his lvl 6 without any support involved or him diving me, so I got blink early and killed him after his lvl 6. Baically I just killed him three times in pure 1v1 situation. So why this guy had higher mmr than me ? Probably because he's more a team player than me.
I would like to talk to with OP about poker as I play a lot poker myself and I'm aware of the fulltilt super-users, but what he said about his tourneys are untrue and I would gadly prove him if we can discuss it on other place.
" but what he said about his tourneys are untrue and I would gadly prove him if we can discuss it on other place." Well, it simply is true because I experienced it first hand. I would literally have tournaments where I win every pot. After sucking out twice in the tournament, ridiculously like getting quads on the river and one card flush set over set I would just know that I am going to win the whole thing. I could do whatever I want in these tournament and nobody win a single pot from me. I tested the theory of winning/losing based on buyins and how much ive lost. I know that I was marked somehow as a fish.
I also played quit a few 100$ headsup liveplay games and I would like never win a pot. Every time I make a raise I just get called and would lose to some random bullshit, every single fucking time. I make big raises in headsup and they just call call call call call and win somehow.I dont just raise every single hand either. I play my pairs conservatively when they betting. I don't draw for low returns. I do everything basically standard. I watched alot of DURR and other famous players style and nothing special was happening. They win/lose big pots and get tangled just like anyone else.
I understand there is such thing as variance in poker, but when every time you play you see crazy ass shit like 4 people to a flop and they all make a hand and shit like this happens constantly you start to question. When people are constantly playling like shti against you but winning it makes you question. Like, say you have 100 bb, someone raise you with nothing preflop so you call a 3x blind raise with a PP like 88, flop come something like A 8 2. You bet out, they raise you go all in they call you with a hand like 10 8. Make a running flush and take your money you start to question.
I have played real poker as well, and these things happen but its not like it happens in online poker, this starts to happen online when you start winning some of your money back. It always happens in streaks that are highly noticable. I almost won 10k in a 300 man 250$ buyin tournament in real live poker. I was deep in tourny with a huge stack 15 people left, I had like 30% of all the chips. I was dealt KK and made a pot sized raise after a few people limped. I got reraised by a guy with 1010 and then I came over the top of him all in and hel called (was a stupid old man didnt know wtf he was doing) I could tell I had the best hand before he turned them over. Anways doorcar 10 second card was a brick and then 3rd card was a K. So he sucked out on me, then I recooperated. Next thing I know he made running diamonds. This was actually the second pot I lose in the whole tournament because I always had the best hand. The point of this story is that I know when suckouts are legitimate and that they happen. Same tournament, I had someone read my hand exactly when I flopped quads. I checked because I knew there was no way he made anything and if I bet he will just fold. We checked to the river and he was like "did you have quads". I was blown away. I mean, it was obvious that he didn't hit so I couldn't bet but I would have done the same shit with alot of other hands. Online poker, this shit doesn't happen. Online poker you only have the best hand when the game wants you to.
I actually got in that tourny off of a satellite to for 30$. So I still made money, but it was a long drive and took a long time to play the tournament. I know that I was better than 95% of the players there and that I could make money if there was no expense for gas to get there and whatnot. Unfortunately nobody wins lowerstake games but the casino itlr.
Quit posting 1k MMR games, that really means nothing. I am talking about 4k+ games here. Ofc you can beat 1k mmr players they are mentally retarded or new to dota. There is no fucking money in 1k mmr games they don't need to put any systems in place for these players cause they are already bad.
You are braindead. You are 2k shit, not even 4k. And even 4k players are fucking awful at this game and get stomped.
I paid gaben, he is my brother
so your argument against boosters is that valve can detect boosters.
what. the. fuck.
by acknowledging boosters, u are acknowledging that there are people who are that much better in dota. skill differences exist, hence boosters can exist and boost mmr of low mmr accounts. a lot of proof was shown that boosters have a very easy time in the mmr range that you are struggling with. this is evidence that skill matters and not "valve rigging".
then you say that valve can detect boosters somehow. okay. then what does valve do? let them boost by giving them easier games? that doesnt make sense at all. what the fuck. shouldnt valve be putting 8k players against these boosters then since valve is so all-powerful and controlling?
just like how valve is keeping u down? if anything, it is proof that skill trumps any kind of match fixing. as long as u find a way to destroy the throne, u will keep winning. you can't find a way to destroy the throne. hence you suck.
DON'T LET YOUR ANGER GET THE BEST OF YOU.
That's because cancer feeder teammates are, most of the time, between 1MMR and 2500MMR. That low because they are not capable of climbing the ladder due to how hard they suck and/or cancer they are. So yeah, you don't understand because you were good enough to simply jump through the trash tier during calibration. Its a mistake that im not gonna repeat again.
if u are better than those feeders, you will carry them so easily
From my perspective - low-middle 4k is bunch of useless tards with no clue about Dota 2. And they're driving me so mad when i see how bad and stupid they are and the shit they make. I tend to focus on them more than my own play and i play worse than i could - still on way higher level than them. If i see at least 1 solid player then i'm fine, if all of them are useless shit gets real. I really need some anger management program or need to stop playing this game for the sake of my own mental and physical health.
^ this is because game is rigged in upper brackets. i think they rig some certain people from even being able to get 4k if they are a much higher skill. i think they put good with bad against medium often, making good seem like medium or bad. either that or its just a dogshit MM system.
"by acknowledging boosters, u are acknowledging that there are people who are that much better in dota. skill differences exist, hence boosters can exist and boost mmr of low mmr accounts. a lot of proof was shown that boosters have a very easy time in the mmr range that you are struggling with. this is evidence that skill matters and not "valve rigging"."
i never ever once said that skill differences dont exist. i said that i think the game is rigged against alot of people who have actual skill. what im saying is that i think there are more people who are good at the game compared to pro's and high tier players than you could identify by mmr. If you look at upper bracket games there is alot of medium level play. there is also, only a few games 6k+ going at any given time. Where 4k games there is probably thousands. and 5k games probly like 15-20. i feel like they keep the tippy top very pointy where it should be more of a rounded shape
So basically, my theory is, they chose said player... Use inflated mmr as opponents and give them favorable odds to win more games. MMR is very arbitrary actually. Sometimes you will see a 4k game that looks like a 6k game, sometimes you will see a 6k game that looks like a 2k game.
I can watch 7k games and predict quit often exactly what needs to happen. If you watch my video i made(shit qual video sorry if you can bare with it i commend u) but in the video i do make some predictions that run true. I can watch alot of high mmr game and see the mistakes. sometimes i talking from my ass not gonna lie but alot of the time i can see clear cut obvious things that most people dont pay attention to.
Not only 4k's are bad. Just look at this 7k naix, 6k invoker and 5.5k lion in my team. while i won hard vs bot trilane, they just fed and were useless whole game. This shit is happening literally every game, must be in some hidden pool or some shit.
http://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2484468575
People have this delusion that if you are 7k mmr you can just win any situation unless its against another 7kmmr. If you get zoned out of your lane it doesn't matter how good enemy is. There is alot of situation where you walk up to creeps and try to get a last hit and your damage exchange is too high to farm. There is no magic 7k mmr item that will make you magically be able to farm against an agressive lane with no support. I just made a smurf earlier. I win my first game, second game I just DC beacuse I am in safelane with no support against an ursa and a lich. The lich was constantly auto attacking me as PL. I had an enigma in the jungle farming creeps and literally I coulda killed both of them if he just left jungle and press Q on them. He waitied until 7 minutes into game and I only have 13 LH cause of it. Then what he did was walk up to them and micro so poorly that he didnt even get a spell off and fed the ursa a kill. What is my option this situation? I cant magically farm creeps if someone is constantly attacking me, nomadder how bad they are. My laning opponents were nothing special, but its not like they were so bad that I could just get freefarm in a 1v2 lane. Sitting for exp doesnt cut it as far as getting a extremely high score... which is what is needed to not get a even worse team next game. I mean, I probably coulda won the game but ive played games like this before on new account and even winning not enough u need massive last hits and farm to not play 10 normal games after that.
7k player dosan't pick PL and gets some proper Offlaner like Timbersaw or Void for a 1v2 lane...
7K NAIX AND 5.5K LION VS SOLO OFFLANE 4K TECHIES AND THEY LOST IT 1-8 OR SOME SHIT WHILE I WIN VS REALLY HIGH MMR TRILANE WITH SOME HELP OF TUSK. HELLO? 6K VOKER GETS DESTROYED IN HIS LANE VS SOLO URSA. HELLO?
MMR is fuckin rigged, that's a fuckin fact.
I was in the safelane. Why would I take an offlaner for the safelane?
ye i give up xdddddd
how are you talking about 4k games when you are 3k yourself?
if youre comparing dota with poker u actually have no clue what's going on.
if it isnt obvious enough already, MMR doesn't accurately represent your SKILL but your ABILITY TO CLIMB THE LADDER/MAINTAIN YOUR POSITION ON IT.
stop being so butthurt about your number it's 100% worthless. I don't care whether I'm 3.2, 4.2 or 5.2 and you shouldn't either. there is no real competitive environment in solo RMM until at least 5.5k. if you're not able to climb to 5.5k easily, you have nothing to look for there.
it really is that simple. mmr hell exists - you create it by overvaluing your teammates and undervaluing yourself.