Too subjective shit. I mean there are way too many scenarios where even humans would have split opinions about who is being the MVP of the game. Example: a Legion Commander who breaks the T4 towers then the ancient while both teams were fighting the other high ground, or a Nature's Prophet who contributed 10k tower damage should be the MVP? Should someone who controlled the rhythm of early-mid game be MVP, or should the one who became so farmed during that process securing the game be MVP?
Who the fuck cares about MVP anyway. Everyone is going to think "I did X and Y and Z, what they did was just bringing me down in that game so undeniably I was the best out there".
EDIT: lel sincerely MVP is just another thing to feel good even if perfect justifications are to be provided
კომენტარის დასაწერად გაიარეთ ავტორიზაცია.
This is suddenly came to my mind. I think dotabuff could chose a mvp depending to some complicated statics simular with the hero score from hero rankings. I mean, a support also must be MVP. It must not only depend to KDA... So thats it. I hope dotabuff adds this feature soon...